![]() See chapter 17 for particular recommendations. ![]() These are software packages that can serve as a repository for qualitative data and that enable coding, memoing, and other tools of data analysis. ![]() Just because one is able to conduct a study does not mean one should or that the study is worth pursuing CAQDAS:Ĭomputer-assisted qualitative data-analysis software. In other words, the benefits of the study should outweigh any harm (including discomfort to the participants). ![]() One of the three principles identified in the Belmont Report: the risks of harm should be minimized and the potential benefits (e.g., knowledge production, increased understanding) should be maximized. It identified the basic ethical principles that should underlie the conduct of research involving human subjects and developed guidelines to ensure that such research is conducted in accordance with those principles. The report of the US National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, first published in 1974. Research that is interested in generating and testing hypotheses about how the world works. Axiology:Ī branch of philosophy that studies judgments about values ethical questions in research (as when one decides to design a participatory action research study for the purpose of engaging the community and offering a more socially just outcome). Axial coding:Ī later stage coding process used in Grounded Theory in which data is reassembled around a category, or axis. “Autoethnography is a research method that uses a researcher's personal experience to describe and critique cultural beliefs, practices, and experiences” ( Adams, Jones, and Ellis 2015). Autoethnography:Ī form of research and a methodological tradition of inquiry in which the researcher uses self-reflection and writing to explore personal experiences and connect this autobiographical story to wider cultural, political, and social meanings and understandings. Audit trail:Ī method of ensuring trustworthiness researcher-constructed documentary evidence of how data was collected and managed, transparently “accounting for all data and all design decisions made in the field so that anyone can see the data as evidence and trace the logic leading to the representation and interpretation of findings” ( Marshall and Rossman 2016:230). Archive:Ī place or collection containing records, documents, or other materials of historical interest most universities have an archive of material related to the university’s history, as well as other “special collections” that may be of interest to members of the community. Research that contributes knowledge that will help people to understand the nature of a problem in order to intervene, thereby allowing human beings to more effectively control their environment. Given the requirements of signed written consent forms, this is not often possible in qualitative research. Anonymized data:ĭata from which all personal identifiers have been removed, as where pseudonyms have replaced all names in an interview transcript and where there is no remaining link or code between the transcript and identifying records. Anonymity:Ī condition in which the identity of individual subjects is not known to researchers although this is not often truly possible, researchers can nevertheless take steps to ensure that the presentation of the data to a general audience remains anonymous through the use of pseudonyms and other forms of identity masking. Reflective summaries of findings that emerge during analysis of qualitative data they can include reminders to oneself for future analyses or considerations, reinterpretations or generations of codes, or brainstorms and concept mapping. See also emotions coding and values coding. Affective coding:Ī form of first-cycle coding in which codes are developed to “investigate subjective qualities of human experience (e.g., emotions, values, conflicts, judgments) by directly acknowledging and naming those experiences” (Saldaña 2021:159). Research carried out at a particular organizational or community site with the intention of affecting change often involves research subjects as participants of the study. The means of gaining entry to a research site or research population. Compare with deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning. This approach is often used by qualitative researchers who stress the recursive nature of qualitative data analysis. An “interpretivist” form of reasoning in which “most likely” conclusions are drawn, based on inference. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |